201Lecture52006 - Economics 201BSecond Half Lecture 5 The...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Economics 201BSecond Half Lecture 5 The Welfare Theorems in the Arrow Debreu Economy Local nonsatiation : The preference relation i on the con- sumption set X i is locally nonsatiated if, for every x i X i and every > 0, there exists x i X i such that | x i x i | < and x i i x i . Note that this is a substantial weakening of monotonicity Important especially with production, since we want to al- low for input goods which provide no direct consumption utility Theorem 1 (First Welfare Theorem) If preferences are lo- cally nonsatiated and ( x , y , p , T ) is a Walrasian Equilibrium with Transfers, then ( x , y ) is Pareto Optimal. Proof: Let W i = p i + J X j =1 ij p y j + T i W i is the income available to person i . Observe that I X i =1 W i = I X i =1 p i + I X i =1 J X j =1 ij p y j + I X i =1 T i = p I X i =1 i + J X j =1 I X i =1 ij p y j + 0 = p + J X j =1 p y j 1 By the definition of Walrasian Equilibrium with Transfers, ( x , y ) is a feasible allocation. Suppose ( x , y ) is not Pareto Optimal. Then there is a feasible allocation ( x , y ) such that x i i x i ( i = 1 , . . . , I ) x i i x i for some i, WLOG i...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/01/2008 for the course ECON 201B taught by Professor Anderson during the Spring '06 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 7

201Lecture52006 - Economics 201BSecond Half Lecture 5 The...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online