Unformatted text preview: What does q represent? The general solution to a dierential equation such as (2) is a forwardlooking integral expression (as you can verify by dierentiating).1 (All of this is true even if we allow the interest rate r to vary over time.) The general solution (for a constant interest rate) is " # Z 1 2 I(s) rt q(t) = e AFK (K(s); L(s)) + ds + bert : 2 K(s) t where I have made the substitution (q 2 1)
2 = 2 I K 2 and b is an arbitrary constant. The economically relevant solution imposes the transversality condition
t!1 lim e rt q(t)K(t) = 0 # which obliges us to set b = 0 above. In that case " Z 1 rt q(t) = e AFK (K(s); L(s)) +
t
1 Use 2 I(s) K(s) 2 ds; the following fact from calculus. Let Z b(t) f (t) = g(s; t)ds:
a(t) Then f 0 (t) = g [b(t); t] b0 (t) g [a(t); t] a0 (t) + Z b(t) a(t) @g(s; t) ds: @t 4 which means that the shadow value of a unit of installed capital equals the discounted future marginal products, plus the future contributions to lowering the installation costs of optimal investments (it is cheaper at the margin to add capital to a larger preexisting capital stock). The q variable de...ned above is marginal q, the shadow value of an extra unit of capital, given K. Empirical work on investment, however, does not have access to this variable: researchers must use as a proxy stockmarket value divided by total capitalinplace, =K, which amounts to average q. What is the relationship between average and marginal q? This was clari...ed in a famous 1982 article in Econometrica by Fumio Hayashi. Notice that d (qK) dt _ = q K + qK _ = rqK = rqK = r (qK) AFK K + AF (K; L) AF (K; L) I2 2K + qI I2 I +I 1+ 2K K I2 I : 2K wL + wL Imposing the transversality condition, we can integrate forward (solving for the composite variable qK) to conclude that Z 1 q(t)K(t) = (I(s)2 =K(s))]ds = e r(s t) [A(s)F (K(s); L(s)) w(s)L(s) I(s) 2 t We see that marginal q and average q are equal: q= K : (t): The key facts used to derive this prediction are that markets are competitive I2 and that the function (K; L; I) = F (K; L) 2K displays constant returns to scale, i.e., for any nonnegative number , ( K; L; I) = (K; L; I). 5 ...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 08/01/2008 for the course ECON 202A taught by Professor Akerlof during the Fall '07 term at Berkeley.
 Fall '07
 AKERLOF

Click to edit the document details