This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 19. BigBang cosmology 1 19. BIGBANG COSMOLOGY Written July 2001 by K.A. Olive (University of Minnesota) and J.A. Peacock (University of Edinburgh). Revised September 2005. 19.1. Introduction to Standard BigBang Model The observed expansion of the Universe [1,2,3] is a natural (almost inevitable) result of any homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model based on general relativity. However, by itself, the Hubble expansion does not provide sufficient evidence for what we generally refer to as the BigBang model of cosmology. While general relativity is in principle capable of describing the cosmology of any given distribution of matter, it is extremely fortunate that our Universe appears to be homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. Together, homogeneity and isotropy allow us to extend the Copernican Principle to the Cosmological Principle, stating that all spatial positions in the Universe are essentially equivalent. The formulation of the BigBang model began in the 1940s with the work of George Gamow and his collaborators, Alpher and Herman. In order to account for the possibility that the abundances of the elements had a cosmological origin, they proposed that the early Universe which was once very hot and dense (enough so as to allow for the nucleosynthetic processing of hydrogen), and has expanded and cooled to its present state [4,5]. In 1948, Alpher and Herman predicted that a direct consequence of this model is the presence of a relic background radiation with a temperature of order a few K [6,7]. Of course this radiation was observed 16 years later as the microwave background radiation [8]. Indeed, it was the observation of the 3 K background radiation that singled out the BigBang model as the prime candidate to describe our Universe. Subsequent work on BigBang nucleosynthesis further confirmed the necessity of our hot and dense past. (See the review on BBNSec. 20 of this Review for a detailed discussion of BBN.) These relativistic cosmological models face severe problems with their initial conditions, to which the best modern solution is inflationary cosmology, discussed in Sec. 19.3.5. If correct, these ideas would strictly render the term Big Bang redundant, since it was first coined by Hoyle to represent a criticism of the lack of understanding of the initial conditions. 19.1.1. The RobertsonWalker Universe : The observed homogeneity and isotropy enable us to describe the overall geometry and evolution of the Universe in terms of two cosmological parameters accounting for the spatial curvature and the overall expansion (or contraction) of the Universe. These two quantities appear in the most general expression for a spacetime metric which has a (3D) maximally symmetric subspace of a 4D spacetime, known as the RobertsonWalker metric: ds 2 = dt 2 R 2 ( t ) dr 2 1 kr 2 + r 2 ( d 2 + sin 2 d 2 ) . (19 . 1) Note that we adopt c = 1 throughout. By rescaling the radial coordinate, we can choose the curvature constant...
View
Full
Document
 Fall '06
 CHUNGPEIMA
 Cosmology

Click to edit the document details