solutionproblemset4nov07

solutionproblemset4nov07 - L Karp Solution to Problem Set 4...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
L. Karp November 25, 2007 Solution to Problem Set 4 Some of the f gures that are needed to provide "graphical proofs" appear rather complicated, making the arguments appear di cult. This apparent complication is a disadvante of graphical arguments, relative to mathematical arguments. For the latter, the sequential nature of the proof is apparent: one thing comes before another. In contrast, with a graph, "everything appears a tthesamet ime" . Onewaytoov e rcometh i sd i culty is to use lots of graphs, so that the reader can see the development of the argument. I have tried to do that, but there is no substitute for "thinking with a pencil". As you read the text of the argument, you should draw the f gure, and compare your drawings with the ones in the answer key. Case I (Constraint on food consumption) a) Under free trade the equilibrium consumption of food is F T >F so the constraint is violated. (Figure 1) b) The optimal policy is a consumption tax/subsidy. The domestic con- sumer price equals slope of the tangent to indi f erence curve at point A, f gure 2, denoted p d . The ad valorem consumption tax on food, t, solves p d = p w 1+ t . You can write the tax in terms of the slopes of lines p d and p w .T h e f rst best consumption tax/subsidy leads to consumption at A and utility U 1 . Imposition of the constraint leads to a lower level of utility compared to free trade: there are points on the balance of payments constraint, above point A, that result in higher utility. (The indi f erence curve U 1 is not tangent to the BOP line.) Note that the consumption tax does not alter the production point nor the BOP constraint. c and d) First consider the production policy. I’ve drawn the constraint as the dashed line at F in f gure 3. If a production tax/subsidy is used, the consumer price equals the world price, so consumption must be on IEP ( p w ) . This fact, and the fact that the constraint is binding, means that consump- tion must occur at point
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
f rst best policy. Production must be at point C , in order to satisfy the BOP equilibrium. Note that growth cannot alter the consumption point (which is uniquely determined by the IEP curve and the constraint) so growth neither increases nor decreases welfare. Growth can change the production point (e.g. growth may result in production shifting away from point C); growth cannot shift the consumption point along the line at F when a production policy is used. Therefore, growth cannot be immiserizing if a production policy is used - but neither can it lead to an increase in welfare. Now consider the trade policy. Note that point A gives the highest feasi-
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 14

solutionproblemset4nov07 - L Karp Solution to Problem Set 4...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online