george - HISTORY AND PHILOS't'HY O F LOGIC 6(1985 75-89...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
special constructions always stay within logicism? Whitehead was as pat as Russell in his lecture: 'The whole of mathematics is here.', he announced confidently, 'it is mathematics, neither more nor less'.66 But he gave no explicit description of this mathematics which the 'analytic stage' would deliver, so that the trivialisation of logicism is not definitively avoided. I see a rather unfortunate line of influence from Principia mathernatica, in that the philosophy of mathematics from that time to ours has become largely a cottage industry which in fact deals only with logic(s), set theory(ies), transfinite arithmetic and small pieces of other branches of mathematics. While extremely interesting material occurs within its own range, it comfortably avoids practically all mathema- tics that mathematicians do, and gives a highly distorted.view of the variety of ques- tions which can be raised in the philosophy of mat he ma tic^.^' I am most perplexed by the reactions I receive from philosophers of mathematics to this criticism: the answer is either the pat and mathematically unproven 'it's all sets!', or the pat and philoso- phically uninteresting 'the point is philosophically uninteresting'. But with it left unanswered, "philosophy of mathematics" stays in its own little coiner and so remains as mathematics for philosophers and philosophy for mathematicians-as we saw at the start of this paper. Acknowledgements The paper is based on lectures delivered to the 'Problemgeschichte der Mathe- matik' seminar held at Oberwolfach, West Germany, in May 1984, and at the confer- ence on 'Russell's early technical philosophy' which took place the following month at the University of Toronto. I am grateful to the organisers of the Toronto confer- ence for allowing this published version to appear here. It benefited from points made at both meetings, and especially from discussions with K.M. Blackwell, N. Griffin, J. King and A.C. Lewis of McMaster University. For permission to publish manuscripts by Russell and to reproduce the folio as Figure 1, I am indebted to the University's instrument Res.-Lib. Ltd. (@ 1985) and to the Bertrand Russell Estate. 66 A.N. Whitehead, 'Presidential address; the organisation of thought', Reports of the British Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science. (1916: pb. 1917), 355-363; reprinted in Proceedings of the Arb- totelian Society, n.s. 4 (1916- 1917). 58-76; The organisation of thought (1917, London), ch. 6; and Theoims of education and other ways (1929, London). ch. 8. My disclaimer of footnote 4 to attempt to discuss Whitehead's full views on mathematics are not infringed here, for in this lecture he dealt only with logicism. 67
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 8

george - HISTORY AND PHILOS't'HY O F LOGIC 6(1985 75-89...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online