This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Philosophy 140A TakeHome MidTerm Branden Fitelson 03/20/07 You are to answer all six (6) exercises on this takehome exam. Your solutions are due on Tuesday, April 10 at 4pm . You may work in groups on this exam (with the usual rules and procedures for group work). 1 Formalizing Some of the Metatheory of P in Q 1.1 The Formal System PS for P Consider the following formal system for P , which I will call PS . The system PS has the same three axiom schemata (PS1)(PS3) that Hunters formal system PS has, and it has the following single rule of inference: (MP ) From PS A and PS A B , infer PS B . So, the only difference between PS and PS is that the (MP) rule of PS does not require its premises to be theorems of PS , whereas the (MP ) rule of PS does require its premises to be theorems of PS . Exercise #1 . Explain why PS and PS have exactly the same set of theorems. Exercise #2 . Explain why PS and PS are (nonetheless) not the same formal system. 1.2 Formalizing Some of the Metatheory of PS in Q Consider the following four universally quantified WFFs of Q : (1) V x V x 00 F *0 f **0 x f **0 x 00 x (2) V x V x 00 V x 000 F *0 f **0 f **0 x f **0 x 00 x 000 f **0 f **0 x x 00 f **0 x x 000 (3) V x V x 00 F *0 f **0 f **0 f *0 x f *0 x 00 f **0 x 00 x (4) V x V x 00 (F *0 x (F *0 f **0 x x 00 F *0 x 00 )) Now, consider the following interpretation I of Q . 1 The domain D of I is the set of WFFs of P ....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 08/01/2008 for the course PHIL 140A taught by Professor Fitelson during the Spring '07 term at University of California, Berkeley.
 Spring '07
 FITELSON
 Philosophy

Click to edit the document details