This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Fall 2004 ARE211 MIDTERM EXAM  ANSWER KEY Problem 1 (25 points). Definition: Two metrics are equivalent if they define the same open sets, that is if a set is open with respect two the first metric whenever it is open with respect to the second. The next definition applies only to part c) of this question. Definition: Two metrics are uniformly equivalent given > 0, there exists > 0 such that for all x , y X , ( x , y ) < = ( x , y ) < and ( x , y ) < = ( x , y ) < a) Show that two metrics and on a set X are equivalent if and only if given x X and > 0, there exists > 0 such that for all y X , ( x , y ) < = ( x , y ) < (1) ( x , y ) < = ( x , y ) < (2) Well first show that if either (1) or (2) fails, then we can construct an open set with respect to one metric that is not open with respect to the other. Assume that (1) fails, i.e., there exists x X , > and a sequence ( y n ) such that for each n , ( x , y n ) < 1 / n but ( x , y n ) . Let U = B ( x , ) . Necessarily U is open w.r.t. and contains x . However, the sequence ( y n ) converges to x w.r.t. , but none of the y n belong to U . Hence x is a boundary point of U w.r.t. and so cannot be open. A parallel argument can be constructed if (2) fails. Now suppose that both (1) or (2) are satisfied. We need to show that a set U is open w.r.t. iff it is open w.r.t. . We will do so by picking an arbitrary set U that is open w.r.t. and showing that an point x U is an interior point of U w.r.t. . This will show that every element of U is an interior point w.r.t. , and thus that U is open w.r.t. . Since U is open w.r.t. , there exists > such that B ( x , ) U . From (1) , there exists > , such that B ( x , ) B ( x , ) U . That is x belongs to a open subset of U , and is hence a interior point of U . A parallel argument using (1) can be constructed to show that if U is open w.r.t. , then it is also open w.r.t. . b) Show that the Pythagorian metric on R n is equivalent to the metric , defined by ( x , y ) = max { x i y i  : i = 1 ,..., n } Well refer to the Pythag metric as . Fix x R n and > .and let = / n . Its easier to prove that ( x , y ) = ( x , y ) (3) ( x , y ) = ( x , y ) (4) Clearly, if ( x , y ) then ( x , y ) = 2 + K , for some nonnegative number K . Hence ( x , y ) . On the other hand, if ( x , y ) then necessarily  x i y i  / n > / n , for at least one i . But this implies that ( x , y ) > . 2 c) Prove that the following metrics on R ++ are equivalent but not uniformly equivalent....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 08/01/2008 for the course ARE 211 taught by Professor Simon during the Fall '07 term at University of California, Berkeley.
 Fall '07
 Simon

Click to edit the document details