1
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics
EEP101/ECON125
University of California, Berkeley
David Zilberman
Solutions to Problem set 2
1.
Uncertainty (Weitzman’s model, see Chapter 6, pp1116).
We know that MSC = 2 + x,
MB = 20 – 0.5 x,
Thus social optimal outcome is when MSC = MB
Î
2 + x = 20 – 0.5 x
Î
x* = 12
.
If government believe that MB
H
= 30 – 0.5 x, they will choose output standard such that
MSC = MB
H
Î
2 + x = 30 – 0.5 x
Î
x
H
= 18.7
.
If the government like to use tax, and they believe that the optimal outcome should be
18.7 as calculated above, then tax rate t* =
MSC (x
H
) = 2 + 18.7 = $20.7.
Since the true
demand is MB = 20 – 0.5 x, by t* = MB = $20.7
Î
x
H
TAX
= (20 – 20.7) * 2 = 1.4 < 0,
thus the outcome will be
x
H
TAX
= 0
(nonnegativity constraint).
If government believe that MB
L
= 10 – 0.5 x, they will choose output standard such that
MSC = MB
L
Î
2 + x = 10 – 0.5 x
Î
x
L
= 5.3
.
If the government like to use tax, and they believe that the optimal outcome should be 5.3
as calculated above, then tax rate t* =
MSC (x
L
) = 2 + 5.3 = $7.3.
Since the true demand
is MB = 20 – 0.5 x, by t* = MB = $7.3
Î
x
L
TAX
= (20 – 7.3) * 2 = 25.4
.
(a)
Under direct control policy, if the government overestimated the demand, the output
is 18.7; if the government underestimated the demand, the output is 5.3.
The social
optimal output level is 12, thus the deviation is +/ 6.7.
Under tax policy, if the government overestimated the demand, the output is 0; if the
government underestimated the demand, the output is 25.4.
The social optimal output
level is 12, thus the deviation is –12 and + 13.4.
Conclusion, direct control policy is more desirable
as it leads less deviation from the
social optimum.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Spring '07
 Wood
 Economics, Supply And Demand, economic surplus, MB, entry fee

Click to edit the document details