April10_Support - Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Integrative Biology 200A “PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS” Spring 2008 University of California, Berkeley Kipling Will- 10 Apr Phylogenetic tree IV- Data/Hypothesis Exploration and Support Measures I. Overview. -- The truest tests involve empirical tests that examine all critical evidence. For phylogenetic hypotheses (tree, branching pattern, branch lengths, character state distribution), this involves the addition of more characters and taxa. This is not always reasonable/feasible and when do we have enough anyway? This is an issue of philosophical or statistical confidence. -- The simplest form of confidence, which is somewhat subjective, is to show character state changes on the cladogram. Groups supported by more, less homoplastic and more complex character state changes are thought to be well supported. When more of our initial statements of homology survive and are compatible we have increased confidence in the hypothesis. Alas, this may be suitable for morphological data, however, it is very difficult to apply given the simplicity of DNA sequence. -- A general or specific “fit” to external data (e.g. biogeographic patterns) also builds confidence. However, it is generally more narrative and subjective, making it hard to evaluate if you are not actively working within the system. -- It is necessary to express some sort of confidence or make a statement of reliability in order to give others a sense of how well your data fit your hypothesis and to what degree the critical evidence refutes competing hypotheses even if we are confident in the result. -- Many exploration methods seek some sort of statistical reliability or measure to give a notion of how bold or conservative we should be in regard to conclusions based on the phylogenetic pattern. The fact that a nearby sub- optimal solutions exist is not enough to cause us to move from one hypothesis to another. -- Although there is a general notion that we are identifying well supported clades, exploration methods and support measures are really just as (more?) important for pointing to poorly supported parts of the tree. Poorly supported groups suggest where future efforts need to be applied. -- Most statistical methods require some assumption of a universe from which the sample is drawn. Generally this is random sample of the universe of possible independent entities, i.e. they are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d). II. Sensitivity and Resampling Analyses: Various heuristic methods explore how robust the hypothesis is likely to be if the underlying assumptions are wrong or expressed as some sort of “support”. A. Assumption sensitivity analyses: HOW: Assumptions (= parameters) are varied in multiple analyses and the results compared in some way.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/01/2008 for the course IB 200 taught by Professor Lindberg,mishler,will during the Spring '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 6

April10_Support - Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online