summer-Phil-20B-18

summer-Phil-20B-18 - Reading etc For Monday: Descartes &...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Reading etc For Monday: “Correspondence”, p. 115-119 Paper due!
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Cartesian view of the relationship between mind and body Descartes is a substance dualist . The mind and body are completely separate substances. Although mind and body are separate substances, the mind and body interact. Thus, Descartes is an interactionist . Materialism is the view that the mind is ultimately physical in nature.
Background image of page 2
The Divisibility Argument (1) My body is divisible into parts. (2) My mind is not divisible into parts. (3) If x and y do not share all the same properties, then x y . (Leibniz’s Law of Identity) (4) Thus, my mind is not identical to my body.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Some assumptions - All extended things are (infinitely) divisible. - “…it is always one and the same mind that wills and understands and has sensory perceptions” Some objections - It is not clear that the same ‘I’ is doing everything. - If the mind
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/06/2008 for the course PHIL 20B taught by Professor Tsompanidis during the Summer '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 10

summer-Phil-20B-18 - Reading etc For Monday: Descartes &...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online