handoutfernandezphelan

# handoutfernandezphelan - Hidden Info with Persistent Shocks...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Hidden Info with Persistent Shocks A. Fernandez and C. Phelan (2000), “A Recursive Formulation for Re- peated Agency with History Dependence,” Journal of Economic Theory , 91, 223-47. 1 Environment Realizations of the nonstorable endowment take 2 values h t H = { h H ,h L } where h H >h L which follows a f rst order markov where π ( h t 1 )denotes the prob that h t = h H given h t 1 . The initial seed is h 1 assumed to be public. The conclusion considers what happens in the general N state Markov process (which necessitates expanding the state space to N 1threats) . Let Π ( h t + j | h t ) denote the probability of future history { h t +1 , ..., h t + j } given h t . Endowment realizations are iid across agents. All agents are also endowed with an initial entitlement to future utility w 0 . A planner can transfer resources across time at rate q (0 , 1) . Agents are risk averse with preferences U ( c )= E " X t =0 β t U ( c t ) # where U : B R with B =[ b , b ] is cts, strictly increasing, strictly concave. The implied values for feasible momentary utility is D d , d ]wh e r e d = U ( b )and d = U ( b ) . Info: h t is priv. info to agent (except initial seed). Timing: at the beginning of each period, agent observes h t , reports en- dowment shock, makes/receives transfer, consumes. 1.1 Sequence Representation The only real decision for agents to make is about their reports. Let e h denote a reporting strategy given by the sequence { e h t ( h t ) } t =0 map- ping histories h t =( h 0 , ..., h t ) H t into a report of the current endowment e h t . 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
De f ne a transfer system τ as a sequence of functions { τ t } t =0 such that τ t : H t R and τ t ( h t ) ≥− h t for all t and h t . Notational note: the dependence of τ t ( h t ) on the initial state ( h 1 ,w 0 )isle ftimp l ic it(thatis , should really write τ t ( h t ; h 1 0 ) . The constraint does not rule out the possibility that c t <b . This can be taken care of many ways, but they simply assume that the agent cannot claim a higher than actual endowment. See footnote 3 of F-P. If we let an agent’s current utility b u t after report contingent transfer be denoted b u t = U ( h t + τ t ( e h t ( h t ))) and de f ne C : D B by C ( b u t )= U 1 ( b u t ) . Since C is the inverse function of U, it is a uniquely de f ned strictly in- creasing and convex function.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 6

handoutfernandezphelan - Hidden Info with Persistent Shocks...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online