This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: principle describe a natural language such as English. What about a Type 2 or Type 1 language? They can probably work in principle, but can they provide the most scientifically “revealing” account? Chomsky claims they do not. 1. Failure to capture meaning equivalence among sentences such as: John kicks the dog. & The dog is kicked by John. 2. Failure to provide parsimonious account of co-occurrence restrictions. To avoid these problems, we must opt for a Type 0 grammar (Unrestricted Rewrite System, Transformational Grammar)....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 08/12/2008 for the course PSY 387R taught by Professor Diehl during the Spring '07 term at University of Texas.
- Spring '07