Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

A preexisting document if discoverable in the hands

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: n issue. Notes: Difference between Jones and Anderson: In Baird, the payer was ALSO a client....in Anderson the lawyer never asserted that the person paying him was also a client.... Issue here: Does this information also reveal confidential information about the client?? o Identity of the payer is given to the lawyer by a non-privileged person anyway, the payer.... o Distinguishing Baird: revealing the identity of the client tells something about this guy's business.... "the mere identification of the client would have disclosed the confidential communication from the client that he had committed the crime for which he sought advice." also, keep in mind this is was a client. When asked did he pay in cash? You have to answer how he paid is not part of the "privilege"...does not tell you anything about a confidential communication! UNITED STATES v. KENDRICK [Lawyer Client Privilege: What is a "Confidential Communication?" Client's Appearance and Behavior; Content of Communication vs. Fact of Co...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online