Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

Holding the manner in which the district judge chose

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: an effort to rebut, mitigate, or explain.) Chapter Four: Witnesses WITNESSES ARTICLE IV Witnesses: Competency FRE 601 606 Common law: 5 I's (1) insanity (2) infancy (3) infamy (609) (4) irreligion (610) (5) interest FRE 601: General Rule of Competency. Every person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in these rules. However, in civil action claims and proceedings, with respect to an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision, the competency of a witness shall be determined in accordance with state law. Differences in Texas 601: Follows the common law in treating mentally incapable adults and young children as incompetent upon a finding by the court. o Federal Rule 601 purports to abolish any requirements of mental competency for cases governed by federal law, although in practice federal courts continue to hold competency hearings and exclude testimony of truly incapable witnesses, usually on the basis of irrelevancy. Retains a limited "Dead Man's Rule" for certain civil cases (FRE has no "de...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online