Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

Not necessary that a conspiracy be charged in the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: "I have been told Sophie bit a child." Which would not be admissible! So if Mr. Burns says: While I was out of the country, that idiot Smithers negligently drove my limosine on my business and hurt someone then even though obviously that is not based on his personal knowledge...as long as he states it as a fact, it comes in! Personal knowledge is not required! Clear here that Poos doesn't have personal knowledge..he didn't witness the event..he wasn't told what happened..appears to just be conjecture. He doesn't have personal knowledge but he states it as a fact! Wellborn thinks these statements might have been paragraph c statements, did the declarants have authority from the principle to make these statements? (Wellborn says yes!) Four types of authority: Express authority agent expressly directed by agent to do the act o Board secretary's writing notes o Poos take care of the wolf Implied authority what's present here o If the wolf eats a child, it is impliedly part of Poos' jo...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online