Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

Any evidence is competent to prove those oral

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: t the evidence as a chattel or a writing. o In reaching his decision, the trial judge should consider the policy-consideration beyond the rule (to preserve accuracy, precision, and avoid risks of error in memory as to the writing) Because the writing in this case was simply, the inscription "D-U-F" there was little danger that the witness would inaccurately remember the terms of the "writing" The shirt with a laundry mark would not, under ordinary understanding, be considered a writing and would not therefore be covered by the best evidence rule. Notes: Wellborn likes quote from McCormick who does an excellent job of explaining why there is a special rule for writings that does not apply to other things: With words in a law case it is generally necessary to get them absolutely right, small differences in the words can make big differences in legal outcome. In oral testimony recollection or in a manually made copy, there is risk of error....so why take that risk unless you have to!! This is basically the way the doctrine is structured: There are several excuses for non-production of the original, but there certainly is this strong preference for the original. Best Evidence Rule: Requirement of Original; "To Prove the Content" [FRE 1002] FRE 1002: Requirement of Origina...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online