Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: gs are observable by anyone who talked w/ the client and there is nothing in the usual case to suggest that the client intends his attorney's observations of such matters to be confidential! Notes: Information is adverse to the client but doesn't seem to fall into what we would consider a confidential communication. Page 528: Bierman Did you tell your client of his appearance date? This is okay What did you tell him about his next appearance? That asks for too much, because that could go into advice and implicitly from the advice, what the client has told the lawyer. CLUTCHETTE v. RUSHEN [Lawyer-Client Privilege: What is a "Confidential Communication?" Physical Evidence and Documents; Communications Not Intended to Remain Confidential] Facts: Clutchette murdered Poulson in Clutchette's vehicle in a parking lot Led to the presence of an extensive amount of blood on his upholstery. Clutchette gets his car reupholstered. Clutchette's wife is working with the defense; as a runner. Clutchette tells the lawyer about the reupholstery..he's concerned that he still has the reupholstery in his apartment (which...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online