Evidence-Wellborn SU2006 Outline

O opinion witness must have sufficient familiarity to

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: by showing that the witness has a sufficient acquaintance with the defendant, the community in which he has lived or worked, and the circles in which he has moved to speak with authority of the terms in which he is generally regarded. o Opinion witness must have sufficient familiarity to be qualified to express the opinion. Character evidence o Conduct on a particular occasion = "circumstantial" use of character [404(a)] Generally forbidden except for the exceptions under 404 o Acts not to show conduct, but for some other purpose General opinions, not dealing with specific instances but can ask about specific instances on cross. Evidence of other acts Common law allowed only evidence of reputation: Now you may show character evidence as well Circumstantial use of character evidence for criminal defendant rebuttal by prosecution: Once the defendant has offered evidence of his good character, the prosecution can rebut. IN this instance, two bad things can happen: 1. The prosecution can cross examine that witness to prove discredibility of witness a. You say he is an honest man, but didn't you know that he was convicted of embezzlement...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course N 483 taught by Professor Wellborn during the Summer '08 term at University of Texas.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online