PROPERTYNOTES - INTRO 06/11/2007 14:53:00 Johnson v...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: INTRO 06/11/2007 14:53:00 Johnson v McIntosh (1823) Supreme Court, Marshall opinion: 1773/75 = Natives Johnsons Predecessors*Validity of this grant? 1795= land went from GB to US (various states) 1818= US Marshall 1819= Johnsons predecessors Johnson Who has title? Start w/: Who has possession? Johnson is plaintiff bc MacIntosh was in Possession (and assumed to have title) Superior title: First in Time (Js predecessors) and chain of title passed from them. Natives conveyance to Johnsons predecessors is invalid. Rule of DISCOVERY : Nations of Europe- Gives them exclusive rights vis a vis other European nations Rule of CONQUEST : Discovering European Nation has the exclusive right to acquire property from the native Americans by purchase or conquest. 2 Titles to the property: Occupancy - No right to convey title Dominion extensive, absolute right to convey title Opinion: 2 elements: The authority is v. well established- grand principles understood in international law. The instrumental reasoning the alternative is chaos. At best, its a weak point because its a conclusory assertion. Lockes Labor Theory : Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature has provided, and left it in, he has mixed his labor with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. THEMES IN PROPERTY: Chain of Title depends on ancestors claims Relativity of Title think of property as relationships. Definition of ownership based on this relationship. Severability of Title When there is ownership, there is a bundle of rights dont need all the sticks to own it Possession is a legal conclusion, not a fact Some facts count more than others Sources of Property Rights Types of Legal Argument: Authority (custom, precedent, influential thinkers) Analogy (analogy warranting principle) Instrumental/Consequential (policy) Institutional Legitimacy (i.e. Johnson v McIntosh) Institutional Competence (Polycentric arguments) Foundational Principles (fairness/labor theory of value/first in time) Administrative Ease (Evidenciary problems/fewer lawsuits [Rule or Standard]) Structural Hierarchy of Legal Obligations (Right to Exclude examples) Fed Constitution (Marsh) <-> Public trust doctrine (Mathews) Fed statutes -> regulations civil rights statutes Federal common law nonexistent except maybe maritime/admiralty State constitutions (aarons womens clinic) State statutes -> regulations (Maguire v Yanke, Uston v Resorts)...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course LAW 431 taught by Professor Dzienkowski during the Spring '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 98

PROPERTYNOTES - INTRO 06/11/2007 14:53:00 Johnson v...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online