Canned_Answers_DTPA.newburger

Canned_Answers_DTPA.newburger - Canned Answers: Consumer...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Canned Answers: Consumer Protection (Todd) DTPA basics: Consumer, Goods / Services, Seller For a cause of action to arise under the DTPA, several basic components must be met. First, there must be a consumer, goods or services, and a seller (17.45). Second, a transaction that was a producing cause of harm must have occurred, which includes any of the following: a seller must have committed a fraudulent or deceptive act from the laundry list upon which the consumer relied, breached an express or implied warranty, committed an unconscionable act, or violated a specific provision of the Insurance Code (17.50(b)). A consumer is one who seeks or acquires goods or services for purchase or lease, and he can be an individual, business, or agency of the state. The actual exchange of money is not required, only the present intent and capacity to acquire the good or service (Kennedy, Lou Poliquin). Limits of consumer status include businesses of over 25 million dollars in gross assets (burden on D to prove) (Eckman), and incidental beneficiaries of a good or service are also excluded (Chamrad). If there is no consumer, there is no case. Here, there is (not) a consumer…. The next factor is whether a good or service undergirds the transaction. Goods include tangible chattels and real property, while services include work or labor, including repairs. In some ways, these concepts are broad. For example, purchase of an interest or share in a tangible good, like a herd of cattle or real estate, is purchase of that good (MBank, Hennessey). Further, although a seeming limitation on goods and services is that they must be purchased or leased “for use,” this includes any use to which the goods or services are intended, such as for resale (Hennessey). Services tend to be limited, however; a service that is merely incidental to a transaction, such as selling a lottery ticket but doing so incorrectly, is not actionable (Circle K). In fact, if a statute provides for a due diligence defense, then advice that is incidental to a transaction is also excluded (E.F. Hutton). Although money is neither a good nor a service (Riverside), if a bank charges a service fee, then the bank is subject to the DTPA (Ferguson). Further, if a good or service is the underlying object of a financial transaction, then a creditor or lender becomes inextricably intertwined with the good, making him subject to the Act (Flenniken, International Harvester). Here, a good / service exists because …. Finally, there must be somebody to sue: a seller, or sometimes a lender. The DTPA does not define seller, so this determination is fact-specific. We start with this proposition: the consumer’s status is established by his relationship to the transaction, not the seller (Terrell & Garrett). Thus, if one sells or attempts to sell a good or service to a consumer in violation of the act, he comes under the ambit of the Act. This includes salesmen as well as individuals who sell something even once (Pennington). But many exceptions and nuances apply. For example, the agent of a
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 08/28/2008 for the course LAW 111 taught by Professor Bracha during the Spring '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Page1 / 10

Canned_Answers_DTPA.newburger - Canned Answers: Consumer...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online