Parfit - Consequences: No objective/ universal truths about...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Sheet1 Page 1 Parfit Fission case: you survive as both - multiple persons, each survivors of the individual, Parfit claims fission cases show that psychological cases are not one-to-one Ethics Morally Obligatory (ie stopping for pedestrians, saving toddler in no-risk situation): Morally permissible (neutral): Morally impermissible (ie killing people, stealing): 1. Divine Command Theory: Something is wrong/ right because God said so. Euthyphro dilemma (Plato): Are MO acts MO because God commands them or does God command them because they are MO? Horn 1: It's entirely arbitrary - God could have ordered different things to be right or wrong. God being all-good loses distinction as his commands are arbitrarily good (unless he acts in opposition to his commands). Horn 2: Divine Command Theory doesn't hold. No answer to the question "what makes it right?". 2. Cultural Relativism: The MO, P, IP actions are the ones that our culture says are as such.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Consequences: No objective/ universal truths about morality Argument: 1) Different culture have different moral codes Therefore, there are no universal moral truths. People have diff beliefs ==> None of them can be right Rachel: has very strange consequences 1. cannot complain that some practices are morally inferrior Action IP eventually becomes MO, so person A committing action B may be punished for it, but Person C committing that same action soon after would be praised for it. This case thus provides unequal treatment for equal actions. Culture? Individual culture? permits all actions. Paper:- psychological identity: issue of cloning 1. Introduction 2. Idenity as arbitrary Sheet1 Page 2 a. soul view (unfounded) b. body view (body-psychology swap) c. psychological view (cloning) 3. Identity from a practical view: legal application a. Crminal cases b. Civil cases 4. Conclusion...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

Parfit - Consequences: No objective/ universal truths about...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online