ImmanuelKant.Metaphysics.MoralsNotes

ImmanuelKant.Metaphysics.MoralsNotes - Immanuel Kant...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) witnessed the beginning phases of the utilitarian philosophy, found that philosophy deficient because of its neglect, among other things, of moral duty. Kant’s theory is a version of what is called duty theory or deontologism . Kant acknowledged that our lives are full of imperatives based on our own situations and our objectives. If we want to advance at work, then it is imperative that we keep our promises; if we are concerned about our friends’ happiness, then it is imperative that we not talk about them behind their backs. But this type of hypothetical imperative , which tells us we ought to do(or ought not to do) something in order to achieve such and such a result, is not a moral imperative, Kant argued. Keeping a promise so we’ll get a solid reputation is neither morally praiseworthy nor morally blameworthy, he said. For our act to be morally praiseworthy, it must be done, not for the sake of some objective, but simply because it is right . Our action is morally praiseworthy, only if we do it because it is right to keep our promises. A moral imperative is unconditional or categorical ; it prescribes an action, not for the sake of some result, but simply because that action is our moral duty. It follows from this philosophy that when it comes to evaluating an action morally, what counts is not the result or consequences of the action, as utilitarianism maintains, but the intention (motive) from which it is done. And the morally best intention, indeed in Kant’s opinion the only truly morally praiseworthy intention, is that according to which you do something just because it is your moral duty. Kant answered the question, how can we tell what our moral duty is? as follows: Suppose you are considering some course of action—say, whether to borrow some money you need very badly. But suppose that you know can’t pay back the loan. Is it morally permissible for you to borrow money under such circumstances? Kant said to do this: First, find the maxim (principle of action) involved in what you want to do. In this case it would be “Every time I’m in need of money, I’ll go to my friends and promise I’ll
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/12/2008 for the course PHIL 1301 taught by Professor Knighton during the Spring '08 term at Georgia Perimeter.

Page1 / 3

ImmanuelKant.Metaphysics.MoralsNotes - Immanuel Kant...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online