AOS145_HW01_KEY

# AOS145_HW01_KEY - AOS145Homework#1 3QUESTIONS(10pointstotal...

• 5
• 100% (1) 1 out of 1 people found this document helpful

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: AOS 145 Homework #1 3 QUESTIONS (10 points total) 1.​ The following drop size distribution was measured in fog: a) [1 point] Draw a graph of the drop size distribution. b) [1 point] Draw a graph of ​dN​/d​ ​(log​Dp​ )​ of the drop size distribution. Keep in mind that ​dN​/d​ ​(log​Dp​ )​ = ln(10) ​Dp​ ​ dN​/d​ D​p ​ = ​ ​2.303​ D ​ p​ ​ d ​ N​/d ​ D​p ​ For ​Dp​ ​ in the above expression, you can use the average diameter for each size interval. c) [1 point] Calculate the total liquid water (in g m​­3​) contained in the fog. We know that the volume size distribution is related to the number size distribution as follows ​dV​/d​ D​p ​ ​= ​(π/6)(​Dp​ )​ 3​​ dN​/d​ D​p Therefore the total volume of the fog droplets (per unit volume of air) is ∑(​dV​/d​ D​p)​ ×​∆D ​ p​ ​ =​∑[(π/6)(​Dp​ )​ 3​​ dN​/d​ D​p]​ ×​∆D ​ p​ ​ which has the unit of (µm)​3​ (cm​­3​ µm​­1​) µm = µm​3​ cm​­3​. Here ∆​Dp​ ​ i​ s​ t​ he width of each size interval. For ​Dp​ ​ in the term (​Dp​ )​ 3​​ in the above expression, you can use the average diameter for each size interval. ​ The resulting volume of fog droplets (per unit volume of air) is 3.25×10​6​ µm​3​ cm​­3​, which upon multiplication with the density of water, 1 g cm​­3​, gives 3.25 g m​­3​. 2.​ [2 points] Use the graph below to calculate how many particles per cubic centimeter can be found between 0.1–0.2 µm. Just eyeball that ​dN​/d​ ​(log​Dp​ )​ is about 13000 cm​­3​ on average between 0.1 and 0.2 µm. Therefore the number of particles per cm​3​ between 0.1 and 0.2 µm is ​dN​/d​ ​(log​Dp​ )​ × ∆(log​Dp​ )​ = 13000 cm​­3​ × [ log(0.2) ­ log(0.1) ] = 3913 cm​­3 3.​ Let's look at the fate of particles in a room: A cubic room with a wall length of ​L ​ (room volume = ​L­3​​ ) contains particles of diameter ​Dp​ ​ with a concentration of ​N​(​t ​ = 0, ​Dp​ )​ at time ​t ​ = 0. The air in the room is well mixed, i.e., particles are distributed uniformly in the room. A laminar layer of thickness ​h​ = 1 mm exists on all wall surfaces. The walls are perfectly absorbing. Particles hitting the wall will therefore stick permanently on them. a) [2 points] Derive an expression for ​N​(​t)​ if particles are solely lost by diffusion onto the walls. Hint: Because the walls are perfectly absorbing the particle concentration on the wall is zero. On the one hand, we can express the number of particles lost per unit time as dN​(t)​/d​t × ​L3​ where ​dN​(t)​/d​t is the rate of particle loss and has the unit of cm​­3​ s​­1​. I multiply that with the volume of the room, ​L3​​ (unit: cm​3​), and the resulting ​dN​(t)​/d​t × ​L3​​ has the unit of s​­1​, i.e., the number of particles lost per second. On the other hand, the loss of particles is due to diffusion and we know how to express that according to Fick's first law. Keep in mind that Fick's first law only applies to laminar flow (smooth, orderly flow, as opposed to turbulent flow), hence I mentioned in the question the​ h​ = 1 mm thick laminar layer on the wall. The concentration of particle at the surface of the laminar flow is ​N​(t) – it is the same throughout the room (air in the room is well mixed) except in the laminar layer. The concentration at the surface of the wall is zero ­ the wall is perfectly absorbing so any particle that collides with the wall is gone. Therefore, the flux of particles lost through diffusion to the wall is ​J ​ = – ​D ​ ​dC/dx​ = – ​D ​ [ 0 – ​N​(t) ] / ​h​ = ​D ​ ​N​(t)​/h where ​D ​ is the particle diffusion coefficient. The ​dx​ in Fick's first law is the distance traveled by the particle in the laminar flow ­ in our case, it is ​h​ = 1 mm. In the above expression, ​J ​ is the flux of particles loss to the wall through diffusion and has the unit of cm​­2​ s​­1​, i.e., number of particles per unit area per second. Now if I multiple J​ ​with the total surface area of the walls (six of them, including the floor), 6​L2​​ , we have D​ × ​N​(t)​/h​ × 6​L2​ which has the unit of s​­1​, i.e., the number of particles lost to the wall per second (due to diffusion). Now the above two expressions of the loss of particles should be equal – they are both describing the number of particles lost per second. Therefore, ​dN​(t)​/d​t × L​3​ = – ​J ​ × 6​L2​​ = – ​D ​ × ​N​(t)​/h​ × 6​L2​​ Note that I put a minus sign on the right hand side. That is because ​dN​(t)​/d​t is negative – we are losing particles, while as the flux term is positive ­ therefore we put a minus sign so that it expresses the actual loss of particles. You can then rearrange the above expression as ​dN​(t)​/N​(t) = – (6​D/hL​)​d​t Simple integration of the above expression gives you ln​N​(t) – ln​N​(0) = – (6​D/hL​) t here ​N​(0) is the particle concentration at t = 0. or N​(t) = ​N​(0) exp[ – (6​D/hL​) t ] It is an exponential decay for ​N​(t). b) [2 points] Can you do the same calculation for gravitational settling? The particles reach a terminal settling velocity in no time. Let's use ​u​t​ to represent the terminal velocity. Before we get started, let me throw this out there: the flux of particles (or molecules) in a flow with velocity ​u​ and particle (or molecule) concentration ​N​ is just ​N​ × ​u​. In fact, chemical flux or transport flux are defined as such. With that being said, then the loss of particles to the floor due to gravitational settling can be expressed as ​N​(t) × ​u​t​ × ​L2​​ ­ here ​L2 ​​ is the surface area of the floor. This expression has the unit of s​­1​, i.e., number of particles lost due to gravitational settling. Similar to what we did in 3a), we have dN​(t)​/d​t × ​L3​​ = – ​N​(t) × ​u​t​ × ​L2​​ (note again the minus sign). Which can be easily rearranged as dN​(t)​/N​(t) = – (​u​t​/L​)​d​t Simple integration gives N​(t) = ​N​(0)exp[ – (​u​t​/L​)t ] It is an exponential decay (loss) for ​N​(t). c) [1 point] Discuss qualitatively (without calculations) how the two loss processes depend on ​Dp​​ . The particle diffusion coefficient ​D ​ ∝ ​Dp​​ ­1​ – the larger the particle, the smaller the diffusion coefficient hence the slower the diffusional loss, reflected here as a slower decrease of ​N​(t) with time. This makes intuitive sense. The particle gravitational terminal settling velocity ​ut​​ ∝ ​Dp​​ ­2​ ­ the larger the particle, the larger the terminal velocity hence the faster the gravitational settling loss, reflected here as a faster decrease of ​N​(t) with time. Again, this makes intuitive sense. ...
View Full Document

• Winter '17
• Quinbin LI
• Fick, drop size distribution

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern