HADM 301 HW2 433362 - Will Malnati 433362 301 HW #2...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Will Malnati 433362 301 HW #2 09/20/05 a) The current table mix is not very efficient for several reasons. For one, there is an insufficient amount of tables for accommodating parties larger than 6. According to probability, 30% of the party sizes will be parties of 7 or more, however, there is only one 10-top to fit them in without moving two tables together. Therefore, it would more efficient to have more 10-tops and less 4-tops. Another problem is that 30% of the parties are forecasted to be taken up by groups of 3 and 4, while 73% of the table mix (or 20 tables) are designated to 4-tops. With the current table configuration, the restaurant is losing over 200 customers per night and the utilization rates of the different table sizes are very lopsided, as is true with 4-tops which have an average utilization rate of only 66.78% at peak periods. Finally, with only about 255 customers being served per night, 66....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/31/2007 for the course H ADM 301 taught by Professor Rverma during the Fall '06 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 4

HADM 301 HW2 433362 - Will Malnati 433362 301 HW #2...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online