November 12

November 12 - November 12, 2007 Objections 2) When Skinner...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: November 12, 2007 Objections 2) When Skinner allows that with feelings, the private person has useful information, the behavioral scientist no longer seems to have such an adequate basis for observation and perhaps anticipation of human behavior. 3) Skinner makes question begging assumptions (i.e. he assumes what he needs to show). 4) It is not clear what is observing the internal states. Observations without an observer is really kind of unthinkable. 5) Feelings and thoughts are not observations. A) Reductionism 1) Reductionism (in the neutral, non pejorative sense) Would be a theoretical view holding that complicated seeming entities or phenomena of Type X can be reduced to (ie adequately explained in terms of) simpler entities or phenomena of type Y. For example, some would claim that beliefs (mental) reduce to certain brain states.(physical)For example, some would claim that beliefs (mental) reduce to certain brain states....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

November 12 - November 12, 2007 Objections 2) When Skinner...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online