AbnormalPsychologyandLaw3

AbnormalPsychologyandLaw3 - Abnormal Psychology & the Law...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Competency to Stand Trial and the Insanity Defense
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Distinguishing the evaluations Competency to Stand Trial Assesses whether a defendant has the capacity to participate adequately in the trial process Not part of the trial—a defendant must be CST for a trial to commence/continue The Insanity Defense A legal defense used as part of the trial process An affirmative defense
Background image of page 2
Competency to Stand Trial The most common competency question 15-20% of adults evaluated found IST Higher for juveniles
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Competency to Stand Trial Constitutional Basis of CST : 14 th Amendment: Due Process/that the process be fair 6 th Amendment: Right to effective counsel and to present evidence Assurance of CST necessary for Individual rights/fairness Integrity of the system
Background image of page 4
Competency to Stand Trial Specific legal decisions governing CST Dusky v US (US Supreme Court, 1960) Drope v Missouri (US Supreme Court, 1975)
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Dusky v US (1960) A defendant must have “sufficient present ability to consult with his attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him”
Background image of page 6
Drope v Missouri (1975) A defendant must have the capacity “to assist in preparing his defense” (not just understanding)
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Elements of Trial Competency Present ability Ability must be sufficient/reasonable Ability Rational and factual Reasonable degree
Background image of page 8
Elements of Trial Competency Not related to any specific diagnosis Standard is a low one Specific requirements may depend on demands (a controversial issue)
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Elements of Trial Competency Understanding
Background image of page 10
Image of page 11
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/25/2008 for the course PSYCH 341 taught by Professor Aaron during the Fall '08 term at UVA.

Page1 / 27

AbnormalPsychologyandLaw3 - Abnormal Psychology & the Law...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 11. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online