40 Risk Management - If you cannot attend the alternative...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
If you cannot attend the alternative Final given on Saturday 12 May 9 am, please contact Prof. Stedinger to confirm alternative arrangements. Tuesday e-mail went to all those for whom special arrangements expected. till time to file a review of the course on- e, PLEASE. cture 40 Still time to file a review of the course on line, PLEASE. Lecture 40 Risk Management putting it all together 1 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
–––– Delbert and Risk Management –––– 2 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40
Background image of page 2
3 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Developmental Stages in Risk Management ± All we have to do is get the numbers right. ± All we have to do is tell them the numbers. ± All we have to do is explain what we mean by the numbers. ll we have to do is show them that they've accepted similar ± All we have to do is show them that they ve accepted similar risks in the past. ± All we have to do is show them that it's a good deal for them. ± All we have to do is treat them nice. ± All we have to do is make them partners. ± All of the above. SOURCE: Baruch Fischoff, “Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: enty Years of Process ” isk Analysis 15 37 5 1995 4 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40 Twenty Years of Process, Risk Analysis, 15 :137-45, 1995.
Background image of page 4
Delbert - What is wrong in Life 5 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Informing Decisions in Democratic Society Criterion Measurement procedure Getting the science right Ask risk analytic experts who represent the spectrum of interested and affected parties to judge the technical adequacy of the risk- analyticeffort Getting the right science Ask representatives of the interested and affected parties how well their concerns were addressed by the scientific work that informed the decision Getting the right participation Ask public officials and representatives of the interested and affected parties if there were other parties that should have been involved Getting the participation right Ask representatives of the parties whether they were adequately consulted during the process; if there were specific points when they could have contributed but did not have the opportunity Developing accurate, balanced, and informative synthesis Ask representatives of the parties how well they understand the bases for the decision; whether they perceived any bias in 6 2 May 2007Jery Stedinger Lecture 40 information coming from the responsible organization NRC, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Washington DC, 1996.
Background image of page 6
How do we decide: How safe is safe enough ? ho decides: ow safe is safe enough ? Who decides: How safe is safe enough ? What is safety ?
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/28/2008 for the course CEE 5970 taught by Professor Stedinger during the Spring '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 46

40 Risk Management - If you cannot attend the alternative...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online