This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: February 3, 2005 Physics 681481; CS 483: Discussion of #1 I. Manipulating simple operators. (a) An algebraic way (ridiculously complicated, of course, since the result is obvious from the nonalgebraic definition) to check that the square of the SWAP operator, S ij = n i n j + n i n j + ( X i X j )( n i n j + n i n j ) , (1) is 1 , is to note first that X i X j commutes with both ( n i n j + n i n j ) and with ( n i n j + n i n j ), as a consequence of the fact that X and n operators associated with the same qubit satisfy nX = X n , nX = Xn , (2) while all operators associated with different qubits commute. Therefore bringing X i X j through either ( n i n j + n i n j ) or ( n i n j + n i n j ) simply interchanges each n and n . But both quantities are invariant under such an interchange. Consequently S 2 ij = ( n i n j + n i n j ) 2 + ( X i X j ) 2 ( n i n j + n i n j ) 2 + 2( X i X j ) ( n i n j + n i n j )( n i n j + n i n j ) . (3) Because number operators associated with the same qubit satisfy n 2 = n , n 2 = n , n n = nn = , (4) the first term in (3) simplifies to ( n...
View Full
Document
 Spring '05
 ANON
 Physics

Click to edit the document details