chapter2

# chapter2 - Last revised 4/30/05 LECTURE NOTES ON QUANTUM...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Last revised 4/30/05 LECTURE NOTES ON QUANTUM COMPUTATION Cornell University, Physics 481-681, CS 483; Spring, 2005 c ± 2005, N. David Mermin II. Quantum Computation A. The general computational process We would like a suitably programmed quantum computer to act on a number x to produce another number f ( x ) for some speciFed function f . Appropriately interpreted, with an accuracy that increases with increasing k , we can treat all such numbers as non- negative integers less than 2 k . Each integer is represented in the quantum computer by the corresponding computational-basis state of k qubits: 1 x ↔ | x i k . If we specify x as an n -bit integer and f ( x ) as an m -bit integer, then we shall need at least n + m qubits: an group of n -qubits, called the input register , to represent x , and another set of m -qubits, called the output register , to represent f ( x ). Qubits being a scarce commodity, you might wonder why we need separate registers for input and output. One important reason is that if f ( x ) assigns the same value to di±erent values of x , as many interesting functions do, then the computation cannot be inverted if its the only e±ect is to transform the contents of a single register from x to f ( x ). Having separate registers for input and output is standard practice in the classical theory of reversible computation. Since (as remarked in Chapter 1 and expanded on in Section C of this chapter) quantum computers must operate reversibly (except for measurement gates) to perform their magic, quantum computers are generally designed to operate on input and output registers. We shall Fnd that this procedure can be exploited by a quantum computer in some strikingly nonclassical ways. The computational process will generally require many qubits besides the n + m in the input and output registers, but we shall ignore these additional qubits for the moment, viewing a computation as doing nothing more than applying a unitary transformation, U f to the n + m qubits of the input and output registers. We shall return to the fundamental question of why the additional qubits can be ignored in Section C. To deFne unitary transformations U it is enough to deFne their action on any basis, since any other state | Ψ i must be a linear superposition of basis states, and therefore, since unitary transformations are linear, their action on Ψ is entirely determined by their action on the basis. In most cases of interest one takes the basis in which U is deFned to be the computational (classical) basis. In many cases (such as the deFnition below 1 ²rom here on Cbits will pretty much vanish from the scene, so I shall (reluctantly) replace “Qbit” with the ridiculous term “qubit” used by everybody else. 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
of U f ) the action of U on each computational basis state is simply to produce another computational basis state. Since U must have an inverse, it therefore acts on the entire computational basis as a permutation, just as a classical transformation does. Since linear
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 09/28/2008 for the course PHYS 481 taught by Professor Anon during the Spring '05 term at Cornell.

### Page1 / 37

chapter2 - Last revised 4/30/05 LECTURE NOTES ON QUANTUM...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online