Close Reading, Coetzee

Close Reading, Coetzee - December 3, 2006 Freshmen Writing...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
December 3, 2006 Freshmen Writing Close Reading Mental Capacity Equals Moral Obligation For as long as anyone can remember, the debate of animal rights has been a heated topic with no absolute answer. While some believe that being animals ourselves and being higher on the food chain, it is only natural for us humans to consume animals. At the same time, there are some that feel the exploitation of animals for any reason, even for food, is morally wrong. In her novel, Coetzee presents this argument from many different angles and shows an interesting point of view from the standpoint of the philosopher. By emphasizing the capacity and capability of the human mind, Costello demonstrates the possibility for humans to think there way into the existence of non- rational beings, therefore allowing them to be sympathetic to the plight of animals. Coetzee attempts to portray the point of view that if one can imagine themself into the mind of an animal, they should have sympathy for their situation. It may seem
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Close Reading, Coetzee - December 3, 2006 Freshmen Writing...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online