# PS3-answers - Department of Economics University of...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Department of Economics Fall 2007 University of California Prof. Woroch Economics 140: PROBLEM SET 3 ANSWER SHEET 1 In Problem Set 2, you estimated the returns to education by running a regression of ln(wage) on years of education. When responding to the questions below, keep in mind that when the dependent variable is expressed in natural logs, its derivative with respect to an explanatory variable can be interpreted as the percentage change in the dependent variable associated with an increase of 1 unit in the explanatory variable. Formally, in x. increase unit - one a from resulting y in change percentage 1 ) ln( = = dx dy y dx y d a) You suspect that the condition E[ u i | X ] = 0 in the model i i i u edu wage + + = 1 0 ) ln( β may not be satisfied. Think of reasons why this might be the case (you don’t have to write them). What would be the consequence of violating this assumption on your OLS estimate of 1 ? Answer : The consequence of violating E[ u i | X ] = 0 will be a biased OLS estimate of 1 in both small and large samples. The direction of the bias depends on the sign of the correlation between X and u. b) Someone suggests to you that job tenure might be an important reason why E[ u i | X ] = 0 is violated. People with more job experience tend to have higher wages. You, of course, had already thought of it in part (a). i) What do you think is the sign of the correlation between years of schooling and tenure? ii) If the effect of tenure on wages is an important part of u i , what do you think will be the sign of cov( u,edu )? iii) Write an expression for the ] ˆ [ 1 E that allows you to predict whether there is any bias induced by tenure on your OLS estimate of 1 which is denoted by 1 ˆ . What is the direction of the bias in 1 induced by tenure (if any)? Answer: i) Generally, remaining in school for one year more delays job market entry by one year. Hence, job tenure and schooling for a given age cohort should be negatively correlated. ii) Since longer job tenure is associated with higher wages and since education is negatively correlated with tenure, the sign of cov( u, edu ) should be negative. iii) 1 1 1 1 ) var( ) , cov( ) var( ) , cov( ) , cov( ) var( ) , cov(ln ] ˆ [ < + = + = = edu edu u edu edu u edu edu edu edu wage E Since Cov( u, edu ) < 0, 1 ˆ is biased downwards from the true slope value. c) A way to confirm your point in (b), is to estimate a regression that controls for years of schooling and job tenure: i i i i e tenure edu wage + + + = 2 1 0 ) ln( γ . How do you think 1 ˆ will compare to 1 ˆ if your point in (b) is correct? Answer : It should be the case that 1 ˆ > 1 ˆ . More precisely, edu u u edu σ ρ , 1 1 ˆ + from Equation (6.1). Above we reasoned that 0 , < u edu and so the OLSE under-estimates the true value.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 d) When looking again at the data on education and wages from PS2 (i.e., PS2 Excel file (ch8_cps_500 ).xls) you notice that your strategy in (c) is hard to implement since you don’t have a tenure variable. However, you do have the variable age. If you make the strong assumption that everyone starts working when they finish school, then you can construct an approximation to tenure using this age and
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 9

PS3-answers - Department of Economics University of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online