02. Questions

02. Questions - Stewart Hypos Assume the Supreme Court in...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Stewart Hypos Assume the Supreme Court in Stewart reversed the judgment of conviction and entered a judgment of acquittal on the grounds that the evidence was legally insufficient for any reasonable jury to find the defendant guilty of arson. [Recall that what the Court actually did was reverse and order a new trial on the grounds that the jury verdict was against the weight of the evidence.] 1. A week later a Connecticut court hears case in which the defendant (Abe) is charged with arson for burning down a barn belonging to Victor that was 18 rods away from Victor’s dwelling house and separated from it by a highway. If Abe files a motion for judgment of acquittal, how should the court decide? Why? 2. A week after the Stewart decision a Connecticut court hears case in which the defendant (Bob) is charged with arson for burning down a tool shed belonging to Victor that was 8 rods away from Victor’s dwelling house and separated from it by a dirt road. If Bob files a motion for judgment of acquittal, how should the court decide? Why?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/22/2008 for the course LAW 101 taught by Professor Shellenberger during the Fall '08 term at Temple.

Page1 / 2

02. Questions - Stewart Hypos Assume the Supreme Court in...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online