HST 369 Notes - Was Japan Feudal

HST 369 Notes - Was Japan Feudal - HST 369 Notes – Was...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: HST 369 Notes – Was Japan Feudal? 10/10/07 Discussion Questions: 1. What does Mass mean when he writes of feudalism as “an abstraction twice removed”? How did that invite problems for the scholars trying to analyze Japanese history in terms of feudalism? a. Book notes: It was invented and with Europe in mind. Scholars got messed up on chronology because of the model. 2. As Mass explains early in the section on chieftainship, what were Yoritomo’s “traditional” war aims? What new institutions and practices did Yoritomo introduce, and how did they help him secure an independent hold on power? a. Book notes: ruled Kanto; all followers welcome; get land under his name 3. Why according to Mass, would Yoritomo be upset to learn that people remembered him as the first shogun? What was the significance of that title to Yoritomo? To those who came after him? a. Book notes: Old shogun name was either for emergencies or to deputize and send people to fight in the North = not good. He abandoned the title before he didn’t people to fight in the North = not good....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/19/2008 for the course HIST 369 taught by Professor Segal during the Fall '07 term at Michigan State University.

Page1 / 2

HST 369 Notes - Was Japan Feudal - HST 369 Notes – Was...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online