Derrida - Patrick McGee Derrida Note: Derrida's thought is...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Patrick McGee Derrida Note: Derrida's thought is incredibly subtle and not easily reduced to paraphrase. In our textbook, the editor has done a valiant job of selecting portions of "Plato's Pharmacy," but he has also left out portions that would make more clear the sections that we read. Use my notes to get an idea of what to look for in your reading, but do not take my notes as an attempt to summarize the argument of the entire text. Use the notes as a way of entering the text through different doors. Study the notes and then read the text again. Come to class with questions related to specific aspects of what you have read, but don't take it for granted that either I or your fellow students have mastered every context in this text. In class, when you point to a specific passage, you need to try and explain the context in which the passage appears. It's the effort that counts. 1. Text. " A text is not a text unless it hides from the first comer, from the first glance, the law of its composition and the rules of its game ." These laws and rules are never strictly present , can never be reduced to " anything that could rigorously be called a perception " (1830). A lot of Derrida's thought is summed up in these opening remarks. For Derrida, a text is an object that has the structure of a trace. It is something that makes sense or whose operation can be understood only with respect to an origin that is not present. The meaning of the trace can only be determined through an act of interpretation that must necessarily posit something that it cannot, strictly speaking, know. If you look at words on paper, at a poem for example, in order to make sense out of them, you have to posit something like an intention on the part of an author or a context that is not self-evident in the words themselves. Ultimately, by text, Derrida does not just mean words on paper but any phenomenal object that has the structure of the trace, that can be understood only with reference to an origin or context that is not fully present in the object. Spoken language itself can be considered such a trace to the extent that it does not expose to view the systematic structures and rules that explain how it is possible, how it works. That system and those rules must be constructed by the science of linguistics; and, science or not, linguistics is a mode of interpretation. When someone speaks or writes to you, you do not have direct access to their intentions or their understanding of the context in which they speak, i.e., you do not have access to something beyond the spoken or written words. By the same token, a historical event or any everyday occurrence or perception has the structure of the trace and is a text in that sense. Understanding even the most elementary event requires knowledge that exceeds that which is immediately present to us; it requires an interpretation. Derrida even goes so far as to suggest that a pure perception, a phenomenal object that is completely present to us as a thing in itself, beyond
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/30/2008 for the course ENGL 3084 taught by Professor Mcgee during the Spring '08 term at LSU.

Page1 / 5

Derrida - Patrick McGee Derrida Note: Derrida's thought is...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online