{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

HW 8

HW 8 - 6.6-1 Determine the axial compressive design...

This preview shows pages 1–7. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 6.6-1 Determine the axial compressive design strength. Use K; for the unbraced condition. KXL _ 1.7!14! _ _ rx/ry — 2.44 —9.754ﬁ<KyL—14ﬁ From the column load tables with KL = 14 ft, (#an = 774 kips i — M = 0.5168 > 0.2 use Eq.6.3(AISCEq.H1-1a). 4:510" ‘ 774 Check the braced condition ﬁrst. For the axis of bending, cm = 0.6—0.4(A—A2—j = 0.6—0.4(%%) = 0.3867 2 2 P9] ”2151 _ 7:131. _ 7: (29,000)g8812 =8934kips =(K,L)2 (1<,,L)2 (1.0x14x12)2 Bu _ Cm Cm _ 0.3867 = 0.405 < 1.0 Sway condition: use [6-27] 1—(aP,/Pe1,.) = 1-(1.00P,./P.1,.) ” 1—(400/8934) u5631 = 1.0 32 = __1 = ____1 = .___—1 = 1.176 aZPm _ 1.002191, ._ l.00(6000] 213:2 1 ZPeZ 1 40000 The total ampliﬁed moment at the top is M = 31M," + BzMg, = 1.0(45) + 1.176(40) = 92.04 ﬁ-kips 14 mp 1- The total ampliﬁed moment at the bottom is M 1,0, = 1.0(24) + 1.176(95) = 135. 7 ﬁ-kips u . Use M“ = 135. 7 ﬁ—kips. Compute the moment strength. From the beam design charts with Lb = 14 ft, (15an = 479 ﬁ-kips for C1, = 1.0 and ¢bMp = 521 ft-kips Using the total ampliﬁed moment, compute C1,: = 12.51171max 2. 5Mm5x + 3MA + 4MB + 3M5 = 12.5 135.7) 2.50357) + 3(35.11) + 4(21. 33) + 3(78.77) For C), = 2.208, \$5M” = 2.208(479) = 1058 ﬁ-kips Since 1058 ﬁ-kips > ¢bMp, use (15an = ¢bMp = 521 ﬁ-kips Eq. 6.3 (AISC Eq. Hl-la): Cb = 2. 208 L i & ﬂ} 1 m4 = ¢an + 9&me + mm, —0.5168+ 9( 521 +0) 0.74s <1.o (OK) Member is satisfactory. E (a) LRFD Solution Pu = 1.2(135)+1.6(415) = 826.0 kips The factored moments are Mmx (top) = 1.2(90) + 1.6(270) = 540. 0 ﬁ-kips Mm (bot) = 1.2(30) + 1.6(90) = 180.0 ft—kips The ampliﬁcation factor 31 can be estimated as 1.0 for purposes of making a trial selection. Mu, = 5'1me = 1.0(540) = 540 ﬁ-kips Try a W14 x 159. From Table 6-1, with KL = L5 = 20 13, [6-42] p = 0.619 x10‘3, b, = 0863 x10"3 pPu = (0.619 x 10‘3)(826) = 0.5113 > 0.2 Equation 6.8 controls. As a preliminary check, pP, + b,M,, + 12va = pPu + bew‘ + b,Muy = (0.619 x 10‘3)(826) + (0.863 x10‘3)(540)+ 0 = 0.977 < 1.0 (OK) Calculate 31 for the axis of bending: Cm = 06—04%) = 06—04—397) = 0.4667 251 7:209 000)§1900) - PH= 7! x = , =1.475x104k1 »‘ (IgL)2 (0.8 x 20 ><12)2 ps 31,. = C—m = ——°—-i5—57—— = 0.4944<1.o Bl, = 1.0as assumed 1_ P. 1_ 826 Pm 14750 (Since this shape is adequate for C1, = 1.0, the steps shown below, computation of the actual value of C1, and an adjustment of b,, are not necessary.) Compute C1, and modify bx to account for C1,. = 12.5Mmax 2. 5Mme + 3MA + 4M3 + 3MC = 12.5940) =2 143 2.5(540)+3(0)+4(180)+3(360) ' = i _1_= £1 ____1 = -' Cbx¢anx Cbx9xbx 2.143x9x0.863th3 2207ftk1ps From the Zx table, (13me = 1080 ft-kips < 2207 ﬁ-kips 45me = 1080 ﬁ-kips = ___8 = _8 = —4 bx 9(¢me) 90080) 8. 23X 10 pp“ + beu, + QM", = (0.619 x 10‘3)(826) + (s. 23 x 10-4)(540) + o = 0.956 <1.o (OK) UseaW14 x 159 Cb 6.7-7 (a) LRFD Solution Pu = 1.2(0.25 x 80) + 1.6(0.75 x 80) = 120.0 kips [6-48] The factored moments at the top are Mm = 1.2(0.25 x 133) + 1.6(O.75 x133) = 199.5 ﬁ—kips Mmy = 1.2(0.25 x 43) + l.6(0.75 x 43) = 64.5 ft—kips The factored moments at the bottom are Mm = l.2(0.25 x 27) + 1.6(0.75 x 27) = 40.5 ft—kips Mmy =1.2(0.25 x 9) + 1.6(0.75 x 9) = 13. 5 ﬁ-kips The ampliﬁcation factor B 1 can be estimated as 1.0 for purposes of making a trial selection. For the two axes, M,“ = leMm = 1.0(199.5) = 199.5 ft-kips MW = Brme = 1.0(64.5) = 64.5 ft-kips Check the W103. Try a W10 x77. From Table 6-1, withKL = [.17 = 16 ﬂ, p = 1.46 x10‘3, bx = 2.62 x10‘3, by = 5.16 ><10‘3 pPu = (1.46 x 10‘3)(120) = 0.1752 < 0.2 Equation 6.9 controls. As a preliminary check, 0. 5pP, + %(b,.M,,. + byMU) = 0.5pP. + %(b,Mw. + byM...) = O.5(1.46 x10‘3)(120)+ %((2.62 x 10-3)(199.5) + (5. 16 x10'3)(64.5)) = 1.05 > 1.0 (but close; retain this as a possibility.) Check the W125. Try 3. W12 x 72. From Table 6-1, p = 1.41 >< 10'3, bx = 2.37 x10‘3, by = 4.82 x10'3 pPu = (1.41 x 10'3)(120) = 0.1692 < 0.2 Equation 6.9 controls. As a preliminary check, 0.51519. + %(b,Mw+byMuy) = 0.5(1.41x10‘3)(120)+ %((2.37 x 10-3)(199.5) + (4. 82 x10‘3)(64.5)) = 0.966 < 1.0 (OK) Check the W145. Try a W14 x 68. From Table 6-1, p = 1.74 X 10'3, l7Jr = 2.38 X 10—3, by = 6.42 x10"3 pPu = (1.74 x 10‘3)(120) = 0.2088 > 0.2 Equation 68 controls. As a preliminary check, pPu + bew, + byMuy [6-49] = (1.74 x10‘3)(120)+(2.38 x10‘3)(199.5)+(6.42 x 10-3)(64.5) = 1. 093 = 1.10 > 1.0 (N.G.) TryanZ x 72, p = 1.41 x 10-3, bx = 2.37 x10‘3, by = 4.82 x 10-3 Calculate B1 for each axis: Cmx = 0.6—0.4(&) = 0.6—0.4(—&) = 0.6812 M2 199.5 — _ ML) = _ _& = Cm, 4 0.6 0.4(M2 0.6 0.4( 64.5) 0.6837 71'2EI, n2 29 000) 597 . x = = ’ = 4635 k1 s “1 (K,L)1 (16x 12)2 p » B], = —§mx—_ = M = 0.6993<1.0 Bl, =1.0asassumed 1_ P. 1_ 120 Pm 4635 ”211:1 712(29 000) 195) . P, = y = —J—’ = 15141q 1’ (K,L)2 (16x 12)2 '35 31y = J11— : M = 0.7426<1.0 1_ Pu 1__ﬂ pm 1514 31y = 1.0 as assumed Since the ampliﬁcation factors are as assumed, and this shape is adequate for C1, = 1 0 ' a computation of the actual value of Cb and an adjustment of bx are not necessary. The preliminary evaluation is sufﬁcient. \‘ \., mw‘ UseaW12x72 \ \ ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}