{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

MTH410 WEEK 8 FINAL PORTFOLIO.docx - 1 Statistics Review...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Statistics Review for Rocky University Amin Ahmad MTH410 – Quantitative Business Analysis Colorado State University (Global Campus) Dr. Jose Romero May 26, 2015
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 Statistics Review for Rocky University Somewhere around 2008 and 2009, it was found that numerous in the business world officials, budgetary directors and other corporate officers were acting in a dishonest way. It was accepted that the reason for this conduct was partially because of conning while going to college classes. Swindling had been a worry of the Dean of the College of Business at Rocky University for a long time and there was a worry that the tricking at Rocky University may be more regrettable than at different colleges. To see a percentage of the issues connected with the report, the senior member dispatched a study to discover the moral conduct of current business understudies at Rocky University. An unknown way out study was managed to a specimen of 90 graduating students. A sum of 90 students reacted to the poll with the gathering separated into 49 males and 41 female students. The graph beneath outlines the information and registers the extent of all understudies, male and female who introduced work replicated off the Internet as their own, duplicated replies off another student’s exam, or teamed up with different students on activities that should be finished exclusively. Statistics Review for Rocky University
Background image of page 2
3 Replicated from Internet Replicated on Exam Teamed up on separate Project Gender Yes No Yes No Yes No Male 18 31 26 23 27 22 Female 16 25 20 21 22 19 Total 34 56 46 44 49 41 Proportion of all students 37.78% 62.22% 51.11% 48.89% 54.44% 45.56% Proportion of Male 36.73% 63.27% 53.06% 46.94% 55.10% 44.90% Proportion of Female 39.02% 60.98% 48.78% 51.22% 53.66% 46.34% 37.78% of all students introduced work duplicated off the Internet as their own. 36.73% of male students introduced work duplicated off the Internet as their own. 39.02% of female students introduced work duplicated off the Internet as their own. 51.11% of all students replicated replies off another student's exam. 53.06% of male students replicated replies off another student's exam. 48.78% of female students replicated replies off another student's exam. 54.44% of all students teamed up with different students on activities that were supposed to be finished separately. 55.10% of male students teamed up with different students on activities that were supposed to be finished separately. 53.66% of female students teamed up with different students on activities that were supposed to be finished separately. I built up a 95% confidence intervals for the extent of all students -the extent of male understudies and the extent of female students -who were included in some kind of swindling. There are 90 business students in the specimen in which 5 students are not included in any kind of swindling. That is, the remaining 85 students are included in some kind of tricking.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
4 Statistics Review for Rocky University 95% confidence interval for the extent of all understudies who were included in some kind of tricking is given by /2 /2 (1 ) (1 ) , p p p p p Z p Z n n
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}