12 Angry Men.pdf - Eichman 1 Stephanie Eichman 3 April 2016...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Eichman 1 Stephanie Eichman 3 April 2016 Eng 102—Davis Analyze Movie Justice: Determined by Fact or Persuasion? Should the implications of evidence always serve as fact or can the truth be hidden, requiring a deeper analysis of the information in question? The 1957 American film, 12 Angry Men , recounts the tale of twelve men who debate the fate of an eighteen-year-old man accused of killing his father. If the jury reaches a unanimous guilty verdict, the defendant will face death by electric chair. If the jury is unable to reach an agreement, the defendant will be tried again and should the jury unanimously agree to a not guilty verdict, the young man will walk free. Juror 8, portrayed by Henry Fonda, faces much opposition from his fellow jurors; at the beginning of their deliberation, he is the only character in favor of a not guilty verdict. However, as time passes, Juror 8 convinces the remaining eleven men of the defendant’s innocence. Through the persuasive techniques of ethos, logos, and pathos, Juror 8 demonstrates that the presented evidence has been entirely circumstantial and sways all eleven men to change their vote to “not guilty.” To enhance his ability to argue effectively, Juror 8 employs ethos to make himself appear as a sensible, well-rounded man. Immediately, Juror 8 establishes that he is neither quick to jump to a decision nor does he discount the possibility that the young man truly did kill his father. When being pressured by the frantic Juror 7, Juror 8 responds by stating, “I’m not trying to change your mind, it’s just that we’re talking about somebody’s life here and we can’t decide in five minutes” (“12 Angry”). Juror 8 is careful to show that he wants to consider both sides of the
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Eichman 2 argument; he is intent on considering whether the man is guilty and whether he is innocent. To maintain a neutral stance, Juror 8 does not attack Juror 7’s guilty position, but rather tries to reason that a quick judgment does not equal justice. As the debate in the jury room continues with no clear end, Juror 8 offers a proposition. He calls for a “secret, written ballet” and declares that, “if there are eleven votes for guilty…we’ll take in a guilty verdict to the judge right now” (“12 Angry”). With the exception of Juror 8, it is obvious that most of the men are in a rush to
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern