rape&hunting summary

rape&hunting summary - pages 137-141 Animals &...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
pages 137-141 Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas court case sexual harassment survey of definition women understand what it is but men claimed they had no idea Michigan law specified sexual harassment = illegal sex discrimination o Happens to a woman not because of the kind of woman she is, simply because she is a woman o Not a biological expression of all men According to the law, discrimination can take one of two forms o Quid pro quo submission to/rejection of conduct (sexual nature) will influence employment/education, housing, & other public services status or decision making processes affecting the individual o Hostile environment the climate created by the conduct interferes with the victim’s functioning or psychological well-being much is subject to interpretation; who’s to say what constitutes a hostile environment to a “reasonable woman” standard Gender-based norm sanctified by law = unsettling law can be applied Michigan hunter harassment law vs. sexual harassment law
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/22/2009 for the course PHIL 320 taught by Professor Johnson during the Spring '09 term at Montclair.

Page1 / 2

rape&hunting summary - pages 137-141 Animals &...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online