LiteratureReviewComparison.docx - Running head LITERATURE REVIEW COMPARISON Literature Review Comparison Grand Canyon University NRS-490V June 4 2017 1

LiteratureReviewComparison.docx - Running head LITERATURE...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 4 pages.

Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW COMPARISON1Literature Review ComparisonGrand Canyon UniversityNRS-490VJune 4, 2017
Background image
LITERATURE REVIEW COMPARISON2Literature Review ComparisonIntroduction This essay will present a comparative review of the research articles from the literature evaluation table and PICOT statement for the sepsis capstone project. It will compare research questions and sample populations in addition to the limitations of the studies. Recommendations for further research will be incorporated. The PICOT question is if adults present to the emergency room, does the implementation of a sepsis bundle assessment tool at the triage level compared to the current practice of not starting the bundle in triage increase the early recognitionof sepsis?Research Questions Comparison The majority of the research questions in the studies revolved around early recognition and time management of the diagnosis of sepsis. Other questions revolved around staff knowledge and how aware they are of the early goal directed therapy that has been proven to improve patient mortality rates. Sometimes it can be as simple as obtaining a lactic acid as
Background image
Image of page 3

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture