This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: courthouse. The moderator said it was a secular and a western moral principle. The court was against it on the bases of religious purpose and fake reasons. The final case he talked about was about the Monolith where the circumstance was constitutional it was decided by the state. The court since it also had 21 other historical cases they were in favor. Then after that the moderator moved to the two debaters. The first questioned asked was if theory is scientific and the Randal Winger responded that yes it is important enough to teach the controversy around evolution. The next question was, who should decide if ID is science or not?? The school board should decide by democratic process which is a Constitutional issue. Throughout this debate Jeremy Gunn was saying that there are problems in the theory of Natural Selection and that having teachers in Pennsylvania teaching the Topic on ID said that they are just not ready....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/19/2008 for the course WRA 135 taught by Professor Jessicadeforest during the Spring '08 term at Michigan State University.
- Spring '08