CASESTUDY2.rtf - CASE STUDY 2 1 This case asks the court to examine c whether the Confrontation Clause applies to dying declarations 2 Justice Scalia

CASESTUDY2.rtf - CASE STUDY 2 1 This case asks the court to...

This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

CASE STUDY 2 1. This case asks the court to examine ___________. c. whether the Confrontation Clause applies to dying declarations 2. Justice Scalia would adopt a test that examined the __________. c. primary purposes of both the interrogator (police) and the declarant. 3. Which of the following cases rejected a reliability approach used by the Court and re- established the pre-eminence of the Confrontation Clause over hearsay rules and exceptions? d. Crawford v. Washington 4. In this case the Court determined that the statements by Covington were _________. b. were non-testimonial because they were made to respond to an ongoing emergency 5. According to the majority opinion, the Michigan Supreme Court erred in several respects. What were these errors, and do you disagree with the Court’s assessment?

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture