100%(2)2 out of 2 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.
Riley KennedyBLR 222WI5:00 T/TH12/5/17A.Case NameWilliams v. New York B. FactsPlaintiffs were African Americans employed by a housing project in New York. When they walked into a supervisor’s office there was a noose handing on the wall of the office. When confronted the supervisor apologized and removed the noose saying it was a joke. The Plaintiffs filed a hostile environment claim under Title VII.C. IssueWHETHER THE SINGLE INCIDENT OF HANGING OF A NOOSE ON THE WALL OF A SUPERVISOR’S OFFICE COULD BE SEVERE OR PERVASIVE ENOUGH TO ALTER THE CONDITIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S EMPLOYMENT?D. Holding“YES” IT COULD BE SEVERE ENOUGH.E. RationaleThe noose is among the most repugnant of all racist symbols. It represents a history of violence against African Americans. From 1882 to 1968 at least 3446 African Americans died at the hands of a mob using a noose. Sociologists said “lynching was employed to maintain