Full-Report_CSTR.docx - 1.0 ABSTRACT The objectives of this...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1.0 ABSTRACT The objectives of this experiment are to study the effects of flow rate on saponification reaction of ethyl acetate and sodium hydroxide in CSTR, and also to study the effect of yield on saponification in CSTR in series. Before start the experiment, we are required to prepare 1-L of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and 1-L of 0.1 M sodium acetate (Na(Ac)) solution to generate the calibration curve for conversion versus conductivity. The conductivity values are measured by mixing different volume of NaOH and Na(Ac) which indicates 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% conversion of NaOH. Next, for the experiment, we are required to determine the conversion for different flowrates for the CSTRs in series. 10-L of 0.1 M Et(Ac) solution and 10-L if 0.1 NaOH solution are prepared and filled into Tank 1 and Tank 2 respectively. The flowrate and stirrer speeds are set to 100mL/min and 200 rpm. The conductivity values in the 3 reactors are recorded every 2 minutes until steady state is achieved. The experiment is repeated by altering the flowrate to 150 mL/min. The conversion in each reactor is determined based on the calibration curve of conversion versus conductivity. As a conclusion, we can see that the conversion increases from reactor 1 to reactor 3 which indicates the conductivity reduces across these 3 reactors. This is because the concentration of reactant decreases during the reaction by converting to product. So, fewer ions present in reactor 3 compared to reactor 1 and 2 results in lower conductivity. However, as the results showing, the conversion of the reactant when the volumetric flow rate is 100 mL/min is higher than that when the volumetric flow rate is 150 mL/min. Increment in flowrate makes the reaction time shorter, so low conversion can be achieved in each reactor. Low conversion results to high conductivity due to the present of ions of reactant. The advantages of CSTR are it relatively cheap and simplicity to construct compare with batch reactor and PFR and it also easy in controlling temperature in each stage since each operates in a stationary state. Continuous stirred-tank reactors are most commonly used in industrial processing, primarily in homogeneous liquid-phase flow reactions, where constant agitation is required. 1
Image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Preparation of calibration curve for Conversion vs. Conductivity. 2.2 Experimental Procedure for Saponication of CSTR in series. 2 The calibration curve of conversion vs. conductivity was plotted to determine the slope and y-axis intercept. 1-L of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution and 1-L of 0.1 M sodium acetate (Na(Ac)) solution were prepared. The conductivity for each conversion values were determined by mixing the following solutions into 100 mL of deionised water. 100 mL NaOH for 0% conversion 75 mL NaOH + 25 mL Na(Ac) for 25% conversion 50 mL NaOH + 50 mL Na(Ac) for 50% conversion 25 mL NaOH + 75 mL Na(Ac) for 75 % conversion 100 mL Na(Ac) for 100% conversion The experiment was repeated by changing the flow rate to 150 mL/min.
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern