End of preview
Want to read all 2 pages? Upload your study docs or become a member.
Unformatted text preview:2 ] = 0.2M Trial 1: + Mass: 0.31 g + Water hardness values: 155 mg/L + Percent yield: 77.5% Trial 2: + Mass: 0.34 g + Water hardness values: 170 mg/L + Percent yield: 85%- Classify: + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.05M (soft) + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.1M (moderately hard) + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.2M (hard) + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.3M (very hard) + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.4M (very hard) + [CaCl 2 ] = 0.5M (very hard) Class data are smaller compare to the calcution in the table that we did. Example, our group average water hardness value is 160 mg/L, meanwhile the theoretical water hardness of 0.2M CaCl 2 is 200 mg/L. II. Evaluation- Source of error: + Incomplete precipitation (would result in lower experimental sulfate content than expected) + Incomplete transfer of precipitate from the beaker to the funnel (would also result in lower experimental sulfate content than expected) + Inaccuracies with measurement (result in calcute the wrong measurment)