Three different models were created to help determine which model fit the data best.docx

Three different models were created to help determine which model fit the data best.docx

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Three different models were created to help determine which model fit the data best. Their model fit indices (see Table 4.6) were examined using criteria recommended by Hu and Bentler (1999) and Kline (1998) and results indicated the three-factor model best represents the data. Table 4.6 Overall model fit indices for CFA Model Df P GFI CFI RMSEA CMIN/df SRMR Criteria N/A > .05 > .095 > 0 .95 <0 .06 < 3 < 0.08 3-factor 24 .141 .953 .988 .048 1.311 .0497 2-factor 26 .000 .866 .900 .132 3.345 .086 1-factor 27 .000 .701 .701 .224 7.730 1.250 Note. CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CMIN; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual The fit statistics of the one and two-factor models provided a poor fit for both models with all indices failing to meet the required criteria. In contrast, the three-factor model obtained values demonstrating a good model fit (CFI= .988; RMSEA = .048; SRMR = .0497) and these results aligned with the findings of Aljughaiman and Ayoub (2012) on the Aurora Battery. The three-factor CFA model is presented in Figure 4.1. Its standardized path coefficients for the analytical factor produced the lowest mean of the hypothesized three factors (mean = .71), however, all its coefficients were considered at least acceptable indicators of its latent factor (> .06). Path coefficients of the latent creative and practical factors were all above .08 suggesting all items were strong indicators of the latent factors. In addition, the CFA model showed latent factors were positively covaried ( r = .54 to .61) at a moderate level (Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson, 2010). WITH HAIR THEY ARE CONSIDRED STRONG AT .6…
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

A convergent validity test was run
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Winter '16
  • Dr. Muturi
  • Type I and type II errors, AURORA, three-factor model

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern