2004 exam and marking scheme solution(EC220).pdf

2004 exam and marking scheme solution(EC220).pdf - Summer...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Summer 2004 examination EC220 Introduction to Econometrics Instructions to candidates Time allowed: 3 hours + 15 minutes reading time This paper contains nine questions. Answer four questions. All questions will be given equal weight (25%). You are supplied with: Graph paper Statistical tables Logarithm tables (available on request). You may also use: Electronic calculator (as prescribed in the examination regulations) © LSE 2004/EC220 Page 1 of 10
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. (a) (i) [2 marks] Explain what is meant by a consistent estimator. (ii) [4 marks] Is it true that an unbiased estimator should always be preferred to a biased estimator? (b) A variable Y is determined by a variable X , the relationship being Y = β 1 + β 2 X + u where u is a disturbance term that satisfies the Gauss–Markov conditions. The values of X are drawn randomly from a population with variance . A researcher makes a mistake and regresses X on Y , fitting the equation 2 X σ Y d d X 2 1 ˆ + = where ) ( Var ) , ( Cov 2 Y Y X d = . When he realizes his mistake, he points out that the original relationship could be rewritten u Y X 2 2 2 1 1 1 β β β β + = and hence d 2 will be an estimator of 2 1 β . From this he could obtain an estimate of β 2 . (i) [2 marks] Explain why it is not possible to derive a closed form expression for the expected value of d 2 for a finite sample. (ii) [5 marks] Demonstrate that d 2 is an inconsistent estimator of 2 1 β and determine the direction of the large-sample bias, if this is possible. (iii) [5 marks] Suppose that there exists a third variable Z that is correlated with Y but independent of u . Demonstrate that if the researcher had regressed X on Y using Z as an instrument for Y , the slope coefficient would have been a consistent estimator of IV 2 d 2 1 β . (iv) [4 marks] Explain, with reference to the Gauss–Markov conditions, why d 2 yielded an inconsistent estimate of 2 1 β while yielded a consistent one. IV 2 d (v) [3 marks] At a seminar, someone suggests that X would be a valid instrument, and indeed the best possible instrument. Is this correct? © LSE 2004/EC220 Page 2 of 10
Image of page 2