Bus Law-Old Prelim II Outline 2

Bus Law-Old Prelim II Outline 2 - Dan Opisso Prelim 2...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Dan Opisso Prelim 2 outline I. Franchising A. Background 1. What is a Franchise? Is there a Franchise agreement? (don’t just assume no agreement if no trademark involved) Franchise Relations Act (a) Franchise means a contract or agreement between two or more persons either expressed or implied, oral or written in which (1) A franchisee is granted the right to engage in the business of offering, selling or distributing goods or services under a marketing plan or system prescribed in substantial part by a franchisor and (2) The operation of the franchisee’s business pursuant to such plan or system in substantially associated with the franchisor’s trademark , service mark, trade name, logotype, advertising or other commercial symbol designating the franchisor or its affiliate and (3) The franchisee is required to pay, directly or indirectly a franchise fee of $100 or more. Marketing plan : Plan relating to some aspect of the conduct of a party to a contract in conducting business including but not limited to: a. specification of price, or special pricing systems or discount plans b. use of particular sales or display equipment or merchandising devices c. use of specific sales techniques d. use of advertising or promotional materials or cooperation in efforts *Mere licensing of a trade name does not necessarily create an agency relationship (Beck v. Murray) Standard Franchise relationship does not present a fiduciary relationship (Kienel v. Lanier) 2. Types of Franchises a. Restaurant Franchises – McDonald’s b. Distributor Franchises – Auto Dealership c. Processing Plant Franchise – beer (Guiness) 3. Disclosure: (litigation history, credit history, how was it paid for) - Uniform Federal Offering Circular (UFOC) o Financial statements o Lists addresses, # of franchisee agreements o Rights and obligations o Fees and costs o Litigation *Dialist violated UFCO nondisclosure –Blankenship gets $ - if issue of, “was there a franchise in first place”- going to want to look at list of other franchisees, description of franchise fees, a financial statement of franchisor, litigation history (Dialist case) 4 . Franchise agreements a. no need for written agreement ( Blankenship )
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Dan Opisso Prelim 2 outline b. implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing ( Creek case ) i.e no prohibition of Sheraton coming in, but court found violation of implied covenant i. Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing 1. Requires parties to contract to deal honestly and in good faith in the performance and enforcement of their agreements. (Fortune v National Cash Register) 2. To refrain from impairing the other party’s right to receive the fruits of the contract. 3.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 15

Bus Law-Old Prelim II Outline 2 - Dan Opisso Prelim 2...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online