4/25/17, 10:22 AMWeighing Internal vs. External HiresPage 1 of 8Weighing Internal vs.External HiresWhen hiring, it’s not always clear whether you should cast a wide net or go with who you know.By Eric Krell|Jan 7, 2015When hiring, is it better to build from within or “buy” from the external job market?The question is undoubtedly important, but it may not be the most critical one in determining if a person ina new position thrives or flames out.“‘Do we build it or do we buy it?’ is a useless debate in the 21st century because you have to do both,” saysHarvard Business School professor Boris Groysberg. His bookChasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and thePortability of Performance() (Princeton University Press, 2010)contains comprehensive research on external vs. internal hiring. “It’s not whether you build or buy, it’sfiguring out under what conditions you build or buy,” he maintains.Daniel Sonsino would agree. He is vice president of talent management at Polycom, a San Jose, Calif.-based voice and video communications company that has about 3,500 global employees. Three yearsago, Polycom filled roughly 75 percent of its open positions via external hires. That figure has decreased toabout 40 percent since Sonsino began to get his recruiters to “think inside first” when filling positions.Internal hires retain organizational knowledge and get up to speed in their new roles more quickly thanexternal hires. “Hiring internally also increases engagement. And folks tend to refer others more frequentlywhen their own career has grown within the organization,” Sonsino says. “We’ve seen that prettyconsistently.”Despite those advantages and despite the disadvantages of external hiring, such as higher costs and alonger ramp-up period, Polycom remains firmly committed to a build-and-buy approach.The key to determining whether it is best to build or buy occurs long before a hire is made: The first stepinvolves taking a diligent approach to workforce and succession planning.