Moore vs. U of California

Moore vs. U of California - Econ 404 5/12/2009 Moore vs. U...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Econ 404 5/12/2009 Moore vs. U of California Judge: A.J. Rothman Court: California Court of Appeals (Location, Date): California, July-November 1988 Plaintiff: John Moore Case Summary: Raises fundamental questions about a patient’s right to his own body, and whether the commercial exploitation of a patient’s cells by medical care providers without the patient’s consent gives rise to an action for damages. [First time this has happened.] In 1976 Moore’s spleen was removed and since then, the patient was continually monitored and for 7 years post operation, tissue samples were taken without informing Moore as to why. A cell line was produced from the patient’s cells which are capable of producing pharmaceutical products of enormous therapeutic and commercial value. By 1990, an estimated $3 billion can be obtained. Conversion – “a distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s personal property in denial of or inconsistent with his title or rights therein … without the owner’s consent and without lawful...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/11/2007 for the course ECON 4040 taught by Professor Hay during the Fall '07 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online