This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 22/01/2009 11:50:00 Law is protecting property, maintaining order, safety Laws come from courts(interpreting law), legislature(congress, state laws), common law(court made law), constitution Enforced by police (criminal), Courts (cases), executive( irs, fbi), sue Crimial vs. civil law standard of proof o Civil-the person rying to prove the case has to show mor likely than not the other person has violated the law. Easier to prove. Penalties monetary, Parties- can be a private person o Criminal- beyond reasonable doubt to find someone guility has to be beyond a reasonable doubt. Penalties- incarceration, Parties- gov brings cases. Always have access to jury trial EEO- title 7, age, gender, diability, marital status, national origin, religion, minimum wage, OSHA (workplace safety), certain medical leaves (FMLA), at will right ( quit when I want), contract, pension, NLRA 1896 Case- laws werent being enforced well, knights of labor, unions seen as criminal conspiriacy but not using civil law to restict unions. State court of mass. No major federal labor employment laws, states are litigated in these issues, its the supreme judical court, the plaintiff(brining case to court) is the employer (vegalon), defendents(employees represented by guntner), the workers wanted higher wages by doing a 2 man patrol outside factory on and off intimidation etc. picket. The plaintiff wantes injuection to cease the patrolling and higher new workers. injunction (court order to keep party from doing something). Junction pente lita means pending litigation which iscalled preliminary injection the case hasnt been heard yet. The first injunction cannot interfere with platifs busness. Case by patrolling,.or contniing in it by obstructing or interfering with such persons or any others in entering or leaving the plaintiffs said premises. By intimidating, by thrats.. persons who ow are or here after be in the employment of plaintiff or desitous of entering the same etc. o Doesnt require there to be a threat of force by any scheme or conspritacy amoung themselves or with others etcend with contining there in homes injuction he gets rid of the broad one and says he is just : o defendents are enjoinged from intimidating by threats express or implied of physical carm to body or property any person who may be desirous of entering into the employment of the plaintiff so fasr as to prevent him from entering the same much less broad, just about physical harm, not talking about...
View Full Document
- Spring '09